A Double Blind Study of the "Biocircuit", a Putative Subtle-Energy-Based Relaxation Device
Abstract
Biocircuits are passive devices which are reported to cause relaxation in users, supposedly by facilitation of bodily subtle energy flow. A repeated-measures, within-subjects control, doubleblind study was performed to test whether a "relaxation" biocircuit would produce more relaxation than a placebo-control biocircuit. The study design controlled for expectation, order first-time effects and ultradian rhythms. Dependent measures included four physiological variables relating to arousal and relaxation (frontalis muscle tension, one monopolar channel of EEG monitored for theta episodes, finger temperature, finger skin conductance) and a tenitem comparative questionnaire used to rank subjective experiences relating to relaxation in session. Twelve subjects completed four sessions each. The first session for all subjects was used only for familiarization and its data were not analyzed. Subjects then completed three more sessions each, treatment order being counterbalanced and randomly assigned across subjects. The three sessions exposed subjects to a "relaxation" biocircuit, a placebo-control "dummy" biocircuit and a "tension" biocircuit.
The EEG theta measure showed significantly more theta episodes associated with the relaxation device than with the placebo control (Wilcoxon signed ranks test: p .025 one-tailed). The frontalis muscle tension measure showed significantly lower tension levels associated with the relaxation device than with the placebo control (Wilcoxon signed ranks test: p .01 one tailed). The skin conductivity and temperature measures did not reach significance in any direction across any pair of treatments. Five of the ten questionnaire items comparing the relaxation device with the placebo-control significantly favored the relaxation device (all by Sign test with a priori probability of .5): subjective estimate of relaxation (p .0002), sensations of warmth (p .03), non-ordinariness of experience (p .02), perceived effectiveness (p .02), perceived benefit (p S; .02). No questionnaire items at the .05 significance level favored the placebo control over the relaxation device. The findings of the study demonstrate the superiority of the relaxation biocircuit over a placebo control for producing relaxation under fully controlled double-blind conditions.
KEYWORDS: "Biocircuit," psychophysiology, brainwaves, experiential, relaxation, physiology, placebo, polarity
References
REFERENCES AND NOTES
I. L.E. Eeman, Cooperative Healing (Frederick Muller, London, 1947. reprinted 1987 by Health Research, Mokelumne Hill, CA).
L. Patten & T. Patten, Biocircuits: Amazing New Tools for Energy Health, (H.J. Kramer, Tiburon, CA, 1988),
The authors are aware of the limited nature of their search for controlled double blind studies ofputative subtle energy devices, We would be gldd to be informed of any such studies, whether published or not.
0, Krieger, Foundations ofHolistic Health: Nursing Practices a.p. Lippincott Co., Philadelphia, PA, 1981).
There are several variants of the basic biocircuit. One dimension of variability is in the material used for fabrication. So for, biocircuits have been constructed ofcopper, silk, and silver pldte on copper. The second dimension of variability is in the circuit configurations used, of which there are several. The third dimension of variability is the choice whether or not to mix the putative subtle energy efficts of various therapeutic substances into the posfuldted subtle energy flow through the biocircuit by means of a ''substance'' bottle pldced in series with some section of the biocircuit, All of these variations are detailed in the book on biocircuits by Leslie and Terry Patten.2
R. Pethig, Electrical Properties of Biological Tissue, In Modern Bioelectricity (A. A. Marino Ed., Marcek Dekker. New York, NY, 1988).
..., t. R.O. Becker & A.A. Marino, Electromagnetism and Life (SUNY Press, New York, NY, 1982).
D.B. Harrington, R. Meyer & R.M. Kline, EffeCTS of Small Amounrs of EleCTric Current aT the Cellular Level. In Electrically Mediated Growth Mechanisms in Living Systems (A.R. Liboff & R.A. Rinaldi, Eds., Annals of the New York Academy ofSciences 238, New York, NY, 1974). pp. 300-306.
M. Reichmanis, Elecrroacupuncture, In Modern Bioelectricity (A.A. Marino, Ed., Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, 1988).
Martin & P.H. Venables, Eds., Techniques in Psychophysiology (Wiley, New York, NY, 1980).
L. Gwei-Djen & J. Needham, Celestial Lancets:L A History and Rationale ofAcupuncture and Moxa (Cambridge Universiry Press, Cambridge, England, 1980).
G. Feurstein, Encyclopedic Dictionary of Yoga (Paragon Press, New York, NY, 1990).
Eeman estimated that perhaps up to 15% of the population is of "reversed" poldrity.
R. Pavek, The Health Professional's Handbook ofShen: Physio-Emotional Release Therapy (Shen Therapy Inscitute, Sausalito, CA, 1987).
M. Schwartz (Ed.) Biofeedback: A Practitioner's Guide (Guilford Press, New York, NY, 1987).
R. Sternbach & N. Greenfield, Eds., Handbook of Psychophysiology (Holt, Reinhart and Winston, New York, NY, 1973).
A.M. Arkin, ].S. Antrobus & S.]. Ellman, The Mind in Sleep; Psychology 6Psychophysiology (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ), 1978.
A. Rechtschaffen & A. Kales, Eds., A Manual ofStandardized Terminology, Techniques and Scoring System for Sleep Stages ofHuman Subjects (National Institutes of Health Publication 204, Washington DC, US Govr. Printing Office, 1968).
J & J Inc., 22797 Holgar Court North East, Polsboro, WA 98370.
Cohen H. L. & J. Brunlik, A Manual of Electromyography (New York, Harper & Row, 1968).
S. Isaac & B. Michael, Handbook in Research and Evaluation (Robert R. Knapp, San Diego, CA, 1971).
P. Lavie, Ulrradian Rhythms: Gates of Sleep and Wakefulness, In Ultradian Rhythms in Physiology and Behavior (H. Schulz & P. Lavie, Eds., Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 1985), pp. 148-164.
S. H. Bartiey, Principles of Perception (Harper & Row, London, 1969).
J. L. Bruning & B.L. Kintz, Computational Handbook ofStatistics (Harper Collins, Glenview, ILL, 1987).
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Subtle Energies & Energy Medicine by International Society for the Study of Subtle Energies & Energy Medicine is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. Based on a work at journals.sfu.ca.Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at www.issseem.org.
